VISUAL AND TACTILE ROD BISECTION IN UNILATERAL NEGLECT

A rod bisection task was performed by 16 RBD patients with visual negl ect, 10 RBD and 10 LBD patients without visual neglect, and 10 normal controls. Three different conditions were used: tactile, where they ex plored the rod blindfolded; visuo-tactile, where they explored the rod manually without blindfold; and visual, where they pointed to the mid point without prior manual exploration. Only within the RBD group with visual neglect was there a significant difference between the three c onditions. These patients made large rightward errors under the visual condition but no significant deviations from actual midpoint under th e visuo-tactile or the tactile condition. It is therefore possible tha t rod exploration, which is an integral part of tactile bisection, red uces neglect to such an extent that it is difficult to identify neglec t in the tactile modality on this task.