Ws. Silvers et al., COMPARATIVE TASTE EVALUATION OF AEROSOLIZED FORMULATIONS OF TRIAMCINOLONE ACETONIDE, FLUNISOLIDE, AND FLUNISOLIDE WITH MENTHOL, Clinical therapeutics, 15(6), 1993, pp. 988-993
The taste characteristics of aerosolized formulations of triamcinolone
acetonide, flunisolide, and flunisolide with menthol flavoring were c
ompared in 102 adult asthmatic patients. During a 2-hour test period,
study participants evaluated the taste of each of the three inhaled co
rticosteroids, one at a time, in a randomly assigned sequence. The ext
ent to which they liked the taste of each preparation and the taste in
tensity (strength of taste) of each product were rated on 100-point sc
ales. Patients also characterized the predominant taste of each inhale
d corticosteroid as ''no taste,'' ''salty,'' ''sour,'' ''sweet,'' or '
'bitter.'' Assessments were made immediately after inhalation and 2 mi
nutes after inhalation. At both assessment times, subjects liked the t
aste of triamcinolone acetonide significantly more than the taste of f
lunisolide or flunisolide with menthol, and they liked the taste of fl
unisolide with menthol better than that of flunisolide without menthol
. The taste intensity of triamcinolone acetonide was rated significant
ly less than that of the two flunisolide preparations at both evaluati
on times. There was no significant difference in the taste-intensity r
atings for flunisolide with and without menthol. Triamcinolone acetoni
de was most frequently described as having no taste, whereas the taste
of both flunisolide and flunisolide with menthol was most frequently
described as bitter. Because of the possible adverse impact of an unpl
easant taste on patient compliance with prescribed therapy, difference
s in the taste of inhaled corticosteroids should be an important consi
deration in selecting and recommending an aerosolized steroidal prepar
ation for the control of asthma.