Pc. Langley, THE ROLE OF PHARMACOECONOMIC GUIDELINES FOR FORMULARY APPROVAL - THE AUSTRALIAN EXPERIENCE, Clinical therapeutics, 15(6), 1993, pp. 1154-1176
This paper provides a review and critique of the recently introduced A
ustralian Guidelines for the Presentation of Submissions to the Pharma
ceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (Guidelines), which require pharm
aceutical companies seeking recommendation for national formulary list
ing and subsidization to provide a detailed economic analysis to suppo
rt their case. As Australia is the first country to mandate such a req
uirement, it is important not only to consider the details of the Guid
eline's requirements for economic analysis and the expectations of the
authors, but also to consider, from both theoretical and practical pe
rspectives, whether the Guidelines are appropriate for drug evaluation
purposes. Although the Guidelines have raised the level of awareness
of the need to integrate economic analysis into the formulary approval
process, their contribution as a model for other jurisdictions must b
e qualified by the prescriptive and unduly narrow view that is taken o
f allowable analytical techniques. By forcing drug evaluations into a
straightjacket, the Guidelines run the risk of undermining the credibi
lity and contribution of economic analysis to formulary decisions.