De. Newby et al., COMPARISON OF FOREARM VASODILATATION TO SUBSTANCE-P AND ACETYLCHOLINE- CONTRIBUTION OF NITRIC-OXIDE, Clinical science, 92(2), 1997, pp. 133-138
1. Forearm blood how responses to incremental challenges of acetylchol
ine and substance I: administered via the brachial artery, were measur
ed by venous occlusion plethysmography in eight subjects in the presen
ce of saline, the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, N-G-monomethyl-L-ar
ginine, and a control vasoconstrictor, noradrenaline. 2. Substance P a
nd acetylcholine caused dose-dependent increases in forearm blood flow
(P < 0.001). When separated by 30 min saline infusions, repeated resp
onses did not undergo tachyphylaxis. 3. Noradrenaline caused a mean re
duction in basal blood how of 34-51% (P < 0.001), and augmented the pe
rcentage increases in blood flow with both substance P (P = 0.05) and
acetylcholine (P = 0.03) infusions. 4. N-G-Monomethyl-L-arginine cause
d a mean reduction in basal blood flow of 42-45% (P < 0.001) and signi
ficantly inhibited the responses to both substance P (P < 0.001) and a
cetylcholine (P = 0.05). 5. In comparison with saline responses, N-G-m
onomethyl-L-arginine caused a mean inhibition of 69 +/- 8% for substan
ce P-induced vasodilatation and 40 +/- 5% for acetylcholine-induced va
sodilatation. However comparing responses with those to the control va
soconstrictor noradrenaline, N-G-monomethyl-L-arginine caused a mean i
nhibition of 81 +/- 5% for substance P responses and 58 +/- 3% for ace
tylcholine responses. Inhibition by N-G-monomethyl-L-arginine of the r
esponse to substance P was significantly greater than inhibition of th
e response to acetylcholine (P = 0.02). 6. Hence, in healthy men, a gr
eater proportion of the forearm vasodilatation to substance P than to
acetylcholine appears to be nitric oxide-mediated. Given its greater s
tability, substance P may be more suitable as a pharmacological tool i
n the investigation of stimulated nitric oxide production and endothel
ial cell function.