J. Tapanainen et al., SUBCUTANEOUS GOSERELIN VERSUS INTRANASAL BUSERELIN FOR PITUITARY DOWN-REGULATION IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING IVF - A RANDOMIZED COMPARATIVE-STUDY, Human reproduction, 8(12), 1993, pp. 2052-2055
One-hundred women undergoing ovarian stimulation with gonadotrophin-re
leasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) and a human menopausal gonadotrophin
(HMG) for in-vitro fertilization (IVF) participated in this randomized
comparative study. The effectiveness of long-acting s.c. goserelin (Z
oladex depot; 49 patients) and intranasally (i.n.) administrated buser
elin acetate (Suprefact; 51 patients) for pituitary down-regulation wa
s compared. Treatment with s.c. goserelin (3.6 mg) or i.n. buserelin a
cetate (200 mug; 6 times/day) was started on day 21-23 of the cycle. S
timulation with 150 IU of HMG/day was started after at least 11 days o
f GnRH-a treatment. There were no differences in the time required for
follicular development nor in the clinical outcome between groups tre
ated with either goserelin or buserelin. The number of oocytes recover
ed in the goserelin group was 6.7 +/- 5.0 versus 6.3 +/- 4.9 in the bu
serelin group. There were 11 pregnancies after the use of goserelin (2
2.4%) and 12 pregnancies in those given buserelin (24.0%). The number
of HMG ampoules needed for follicular maturation was higher in the gos
erelin group (27.9 +/- 7.8) than in the buserelin group (24.6 +/- 7.8,
P < 0.05). The patients given buserelin suffered significantly more f
rom tiredness, depression, headache and abdominal pain than those rece
iving goserelin, whereas there were no differences between the groups
in experiencing mental irritability, nausea and swelling. Subcutaneous
goserelin depot injection offers a useful alternative for pituitary d
own-regulation in IVF stimulation.