HEARING PROTECTION FOR MOTORCYCLISTS

Citation
Aw. Mccombe et al., HEARING PROTECTION FOR MOTORCYCLISTS, Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences, 18(6), 1993, pp. 465-469
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Otorhinolaryngology
ISSN journal
03077772
Volume
18
Issue
6
Year of publication
1993
Pages
465 - 469
Database
ISI
SICI code
0307-7772(1993)18:6<465:HPFM>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
An investigation to ascertain the most suitable earplug and its effica cy for use by motorcyclists was undertaken. To qualify for testing the earplugs had to be both easily available and cost less than 10 Pounds . Consequently, three types of earplugs ('Silisoft', EARfit and AQUAfi t [both Cabot Safety Ltd]) were tested for sound attenuation scores us ing an 'insertion loss' technique both with and without a motorcycle h elmet and scored for comfort by the test subjects. The optimal plug wa s then assessed as to its effect on the temporary threshold shift occu rring in motorcyclists after prolonged high speed riding. There were n o significant differences between the sound attenuation scores of the three plugs tested, with all three earplugs providing approximately 15 dB of sound attenuation at the low frequencies (250, 500, 1000 Hz) wh en worn under a helmet. The soft yellow foam earplug was felt to be th e optimal plug for motorcyclists as it was significantly more comforta ble (Wilcoxon paired: P < 0.01), readily available (chi2 = 15.2, P < 0 .001) and the cheapest. After one hour of high speed riding (80 mph), riders suffered a mean maximal temporary threshold shift of 11 dB at 1 000 Hz which was abolished by wearing these earplugs. Earplugs appear to provide useful protection against the excessive noise levels experi enced by motorcyclists. The soft yellow foam plug (EARfit, Cabot Safet y Ltd) would appear to be the most suitable, on the grounds of its low cost, comfort and ease of availability.