G. Hanique et al., EVALUATION OF OXYGEN-UPTAKE AND DELIVERY IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS -A STATISTICAL REAPPRAISAL, Intensive care medicine, 20(1), 1994, pp. 19-26
Objective: The evaluation of oxygen consumption (VO2) and oxygen deliv
ery (DO2) has gained increasing importance in the monitoring of critic
ally ill patients. They can be obtained from either direct measurement
s or by indirect calculations based on the Fick principle. However the
choice between these two approaches remains controversial. The aim of
the study was to investigate whether these 2 methods provide similar
results, and if not, to define the best one in terms of reproducibilit
y. Design: Oxygen delivery and oxygen consumption were prospectively a
nalyzed in 171 consecutive critically ill patients. Metabolic data wer
e obtained simultaneously. Setting: The study was completed in the int
ensive care unit as part of the management of the patients studied. Pa
tients: A first ''group'' of 279 evaluations was carried out in 73 con
secutive critically ill patients. The results were subsequently valida
ted by 423 observations performed in the 98 following patients. Interv
entions: Before and during each evaluation, the patients were kept in
stable hemodynamic and metabolic conditions. All were mechanically ven
tilated. Measurements and results: VO2 was evaluated by calculation (F
ick principle) and direct measurement using indirect calorimetry Cardi
ac output was both measured by the thermodilution technique and calcul
ated (Fick principle) and the data were used for the evaluation of the
directly measured and indirectly calculated DO2. For both VO2 DO2 the
agreement between direct and indirect evaluations was not satisfactor
y. Differences as great as 55 ml/min.m(2) and 267 ml/min.m(2) between
simultaneously measured and calculated VO2 and DO2 respectively may be
expected. Finally, the indirect calculated methods were less reproduc
ible than the measured ones. These observations resulted mainly from t
he cumulative effects of the random errors in the metabolic data enter
ing into the calculation of VO2 and DO2. Conclusions: Our data suggest
ed that the indirect calculation (Fick equation) and the direct measur
ement (indirect calorimetry, thermodilution) of both VO2 and DO2 did n
ot provide similar results. Direct measurements are more reproducible
methods and must be preferred.