PREDICTING THE RISK OF LYMPH-NODE INVOLVEMENT USING THE PRETREATMENT PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN AND GLEASON SCORE IN MEN WITH CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PROSTATE-CANCER
M. Roach et al., PREDICTING THE RISK OF LYMPH-NODE INVOLVEMENT USING THE PRETREATMENT PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN AND GLEASON SCORE IN MEN WITH CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PROSTATE-CANCER, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 28(1), 1994, pp. 33-37
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Purpose: To evaluate the predictive value of an empirically derived eq
uation for identifying patients with clinically localized prostate can
cer at low and high risk for harboring occult lymph node metastasis. M
ethods and Materials: A simple equation for estimating the risk of pos
itive lymph nodes was empirically derived from a nomogram published by
Partin ef al. demonstrating the value of combining the pre-treatment
prostate specific antigen and Gleason Score in predicting the risk of
lymph node metastasis for patients with clinically localized prostate
cancer. The risk of positive nodes (N+) was calculated using the equat
ion; N+ = 2/3(PSA) + (GS - 6) x 10, where PSA and GS are the pre-treat
ment prostate specific antigen and Gleason Score respectively, and the
calculated risk is constrained between 0-65% for a PSA less than or e
qual to 40 ng/ml (as in the nomogram). To test the general applicabili
ty of this equation, we reviewed the pathologic features of 282 of our
patients who had undergone a radical prostatectomy. Results: Based on
212 patients for whom the pre-operative prostate specific antigen's a
nd Gleason Scores were available, we identified 145 patients with a ca
lculated risk of positive nodes of < 15%, (low risk group) and 67 pati
ents with a calculated risk as greater than or equal to 15% (high risk
group). The observed incidence of positive nodes, was 6% and 40% amon
g the low and high risk groups respectively (p < 0.001). When used alo
ne neither clinical stage, pretreatment prostate specific antigen nor
the pre-treatment Gleason Score was as useful in identifying the large
st low and high risk groups. Conclusion: Using the equation described
we confirmed the general applicability of the nomogram reported by Par
tin ef al. and identified patients at low and high risk for lymph node
involvement. Based on these data we have adopted a policy of omitting
whole pelvic irradiation in patients identified as low risk.