Kj. Russell et al., PHOTON VERSUS FAST-NEUTRON EXTERNAL-BEAM RADIOTHERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF LOCALLY ADVANCED PROSTATE-CANCER - RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE TRIAL, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 28(1), 1994, pp. 47-54
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of fast neutron radiation thera
py in treatment of locally advanced carcinomas of the prostate. Method
s and Materials: From April 1986 to October 1990, 178 patients were en
tered on a prospective, multi-institutional randomized study of the NC
I-sponsored Neutron Therapy Collaborative Working Group. This trial co
mpared external beam photon irradiation (7000-7020 cGy) with external
beam neutron irradiation (2040 ncGy) for patients with high-grade T-2
or T-3-4 N-0-1, M(0) adenocarcinomas of the prostate. Eighty-nine pati
ents were randomized to each treatment. Six patients were subsequently
judged to be ineligible, leaving 85 photon and 87 neutron randomized
patients eligible for analysis. Results: With a follow-up time ranging
from 40 to 86 months (68 months median follow-up) the 5-year actuaria
l clinical local-regional failure rate for patients treated with neutr
ons was 11%, vs. 32% for photons (p < 0.01). Incorporating the results
of routine posttreatment prostate biopsies, the resulting ''histologi
cal'' local-regional tumor failure rates were 13% for neutrons vs. 32%
for photons (p = 0.01). To date, actuarial survival and cause-specifi
c survival rates are statistically indistinguishable for the two patie
nt cohorts, with 32% of the neutron-treated patient deaths and 41% of
the photon-treated patient deaths caused by prostate cancer (p = n.s.)
. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) values were elevated in 17% of neutr
on-treated patients and 45% of photon-treated patients at 5 years (p <
0.001). Severe late complications of treatment were higher for the ne
utron-treated patients (11% vs. 3%), and were inversely correlated wit
h the degree of neutron beam shaping available at the participating in
stitutions. Neutron treatment delivery utilizing a fully rotational ga
ntry and multileaf collimator did not result in an increase in severe
late effects when compared to photon treatment. Conclusion: High energ
y fast neutron radiotherapy is safe and effective when adequate beam d
elivery systems and collimation are available, and it is significantly
superior to external beam photon radiotherapy in the local-regional t
reatment of large prostate tumors.