HYPERTHERMIC ENHANCEMENT OF HIGH-DOSE-RATE IRRADIATION IN 9L GLIOSARCOMA CELLS

Citation
Ep. Armour et al., HYPERTHERMIC ENHANCEMENT OF HIGH-DOSE-RATE IRRADIATION IN 9L GLIOSARCOMA CELLS, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 28(1), 1994, pp. 171-177
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
ISSN journal
03603016
Volume
28
Issue
1
Year of publication
1994
Pages
171 - 177
Database
ISI
SICI code
0360-3016(1994)28:1<171:HEOHII>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
Purpose: Long duration-mild temperature hyperthermia has previously be en shown to be an effective potentiator of low-dose-rate irradiation. An in vitro investigation was initiated to determine if 41 degrees C h yperthermia could be useful in sensitizing high-dose-rate (HDR) brachy therapy. Experiments were designed to determine the optimal length of heat treatments to be applied with a twice daily 5 Gy times five fract ion high-dose-rate protocol. Methods and Materials: Rat 9L gliosarcoma cells growing exponentially in flasks were exposed to X-irradiation a nd 41 degrees C hyperthermia. Irradiation was applied in 5 Gy fraction s two times per day to a total dose of 25 Gy. Hyperthermia consisted o f combinations of 1 or 4 hr beatings before and/or after each of the r adiation exposures. In addition, a set of cells was heated continuousl y at 41 degrees C starting 6 hr before the first fraction and continui ng to 4 hr after the 5th fraction. Cell survival was assayed by colony formation. Results: Sensitization of high-dose-rate increased linearl y with increasing length of 41 degrees C heating over the entire range of heat exposures applied. Maximum sensitization was produced by cont inuous heating for 58 hr throughout the entire radiation course. Heati ng for 4 hr before fractions two through five produced less sensitizat ion to these later fractions than was expected if each heat-radiation fraction had acted independent of the other fractions. Conclusion: Con tinuous 41 degrees C heating eliminated split dose sparing during high -dose-rate. The apparent development of thermotolerance during the cou rse of heat and high-dose-rate resulted in reduced sensitization in th e later fractions when 4 hr pre- and/or post-heat were applied. This t olerance was overcome if heat was applied continuously between radiati on fractions. The clinical relevance of these in vitro data is that 41 degrees C hyperthermia should be applied for as long as is possible d uring this type of high-dose-rate protocol. This combined hyperthermia -high-dose-rate treatment may enhance the efficacy of interstitial irr adiation in situations such as boost irradiation of high grade glioma.