INDICATIONS FOR OPERATION IN SUSPECTED APPENDICITIS AND INCIDENCE OF PERFORATION

Citation
R. Andersson et al., INDICATIONS FOR OPERATION IN SUSPECTED APPENDICITIS AND INCIDENCE OF PERFORATION, BMJ. British medical journal, 308(6921), 1994, pp. 107-110
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, General & Internal
ISSN journal
09598138
Volume
308
Issue
6921
Year of publication
1994
Pages
107 - 110
Database
ISI
SICI code
0959-8138(1994)308:6921<107:IFOISA>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
Objective-To clarify poorly understood epidemiological features of app endicitis. Design-Retrospective study of consecutive cases from a defi ned population and analysis of data from published studies. Setting-Co unty of Jonkoping, Sweden. 3029 patients who underwent operation in 19 84-9 and 4717 patients from the county town who underwent operation in 1970-89, all for suspected appendicitis, plus 48 426 cases from six r eported studies. Main outcome measures-Incidences specific for age and sex and temporal trends of perforating and non-perforating appendicit is and removal of a normal appendix. Associations between diagnostic a ccuracy, rate of perforation, and incidences of removal of a normal ap pendix and of perforating and non-perforating appendicitis. Results-Th e incidence of appendicitis was 116/100000 inhabitants. Appendicitis w as more common in male patients. The incidence of perforating appendic itis was independent of age, stable over time, and uninfluenced by the rate of laparotomy, whereas the incidence of non-perforating appendic itis was age dependent, decreasing over time, and related to the diagn ostic accuracy and rate of removal of a normal appendix. Conclusions-P erforating and non-perforating appendicitis seem to be separate entiti es, and appendicitis that resolves spontaneously is common. This may h ave important implications for managing suspected appendicitis.