R. Andersson et al., INDICATIONS FOR OPERATION IN SUSPECTED APPENDICITIS AND INCIDENCE OF PERFORATION, BMJ. British medical journal, 308(6921), 1994, pp. 107-110
Objective-To clarify poorly understood epidemiological features of app
endicitis. Design-Retrospective study of consecutive cases from a defi
ned population and analysis of data from published studies. Setting-Co
unty of Jonkoping, Sweden. 3029 patients who underwent operation in 19
84-9 and 4717 patients from the county town who underwent operation in
1970-89, all for suspected appendicitis, plus 48 426 cases from six r
eported studies. Main outcome measures-Incidences specific for age and
sex and temporal trends of perforating and non-perforating appendicit
is and removal of a normal appendix. Associations between diagnostic a
ccuracy, rate of perforation, and incidences of removal of a normal ap
pendix and of perforating and non-perforating appendicitis. Results-Th
e incidence of appendicitis was 116/100000 inhabitants. Appendicitis w
as more common in male patients. The incidence of perforating appendic
itis was independent of age, stable over time, and uninfluenced by the
rate of laparotomy, whereas the incidence of non-perforating appendic
itis was age dependent, decreasing over time, and related to the diagn
ostic accuracy and rate of removal of a normal appendix. Conclusions-P
erforating and non-perforating appendicitis seem to be separate entiti
es, and appendicitis that resolves spontaneously is common. This may h
ave important implications for managing suspected appendicitis.