Improving the quality of medical education is a worldwide challenge; s
evere indictments of the quality of medical education can be stated. E
valuation is a neglected field in medical education, and major deficie
ncies exist in the evaluation of the instructional processes. The aim
of this study is to describe the implementation and evaluation of qual
ity assurance procedures into teaching medicine. This study describes,
in part I, the Munich Curricular Innovation Project (MCIP) and its ev
aluation as a component of quality assurance. This innovative project,
serving as data source for this study, started in 1986 and is still o
ngoing. A model is proposed that links medical education to quality as
surance. It comprises a didactic, a motivational, and an evaluational
approach, aiming at both the measurement of the instructional processe
s and educational outcome. The evaluation consists mainly of direct ob
servation of teaching (process evaluation records), a questionnaire in
vestigating the motivation of students to learn, and the assessment of
the acceptance of the MCIP by another questionnaire. Outcome measurem
ents were undertaken by assessing product evaluation records and obser
ving student performances in the skills labs. The evaluation, investig
ated by this study, is based on quasi-experimental study designs and l
ongitudinal studies, especially the iterative measurement. This case s
tudy uses methods from qualitative data analysis such as field inquiry
. This inquiry, designed as a case report without a control group, is
descriptive and not prescriptive. It evaluates, in part II, the evalua
tion established in the MCIP, thus performing a kind of meta-evaluatio
n. The evaluation tools are evaluated using standards proposed by the
American Psychological Association.