Since last June, the Financial Accounting Standards Board has been acc
epting comments on its proposal to require companies to recognize as e
xpenses all stock-based awards, including stock options. The proposal
has been on the FASB's agenda since 1984, long before executive compen
sation became a hot topic. The board will begin holding public hearing
s on the matter in the first quarter of 1994. The proposal has sparked
a heated debate. Many investors argue that the new rules would give t
hem a better understanding of a company's financial status. But many i
n management are opposed, especially entrepreneurs. Curtail the use of
options by requiring fledgling enterprises to record them as expenses
, and the number of successful start-ups will dwindle, many predict. I
n this issue's Perspectives section, seven experts consider the merits
of the FASB's proposal. Some excerpts: ''What's the logic behind this
prop The FASB's answer is both arcane absurd: accounting principles.'
' ''The proposal provides companies with the opportunity to develop cr
eative, motivational compensation plans currently restricted by illogi
cal and inconsistent accounting rules.'' ''Giving way on this issue wo
uld reduce the FASB's credibility and threaten its survival. This woul
d be a costly result.'' ''The new rules would confuse our income state
ments, demotivate our people, and cripple a primary and uniquely Ameri
can tool used to fuel the creation and building of enterprises.''