G. Soletormos et al., A NOVEL METHOD FOR MONITORING HIGH-RISK BREAST-CANCER WITH TUMOR-MARKERS - CA-15.3 COMPARED TO CEA AND TPA, Annals of oncology, 4(10), 1993, pp. 861-869
Background: An early and reliable diagnosis of metastatic spread has i
ncreased interest in serum tumor markers. This study investigated the
ability of CA 15.3, CEA, and TPA to identify, predict, and exclude met
astases in bone/viscera during adjuvant treatment and follow-up of hig
h-risk breast cancer. Methods: Ninety females with high-risk breast ca
ncer were included in the study. Response evaluation was based upon cl
inical examination, x-rays or histology and elaborated marker criteria
. Results: During the marker monitoring period, metastases in four pat
ients were confined to skin or lymph nodes, 21 developed metastases to
bone/viscera, and 65 females had no evidence of metastases. CA 15.3,
CEA, and TPA correctly classified 48%, 10%, and 19% of the patients wi
th metastases in bone/viscera, and 100%, 94%, and 98% without. Followi
ng CA 15.3, CEA, and TPA recurrence, 100%, 33%, and 60% of the patient
s developed metastases in bone/viscera. Metastases in bone/viscera wer
e excluded in 86%, 76%, and 79% of patients without CA 15.3, CEA, and
TPA recurrence. Conclusion: Only CA 15.3 gave reliable information abo
ut recurrence. Metastases in bone/viscera were identified in 10 of the
21 patients with CA 15.3. There was no false-positive CA 15.3 informa
tion on the 65 patients without clinical recurrence. The PVneg (86%) i
ndicated that when CA 15.3 did not signal recurrence, metastases to bo
ne/viscera were not likely.