Asc. Rice et al., THE ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF ELECTRODE IMPALEMENT OF PERIPHERAL-NERVES IN THE RAT, Brain research, 631(2), 1993, pp. 221-226
Peripheral nerve fascicles are deliberately impaled during microneurog
raphy experiments. We have assessed conduction block under these circu
mstances. First we recorded compound action potentials (CAP) in the su
ral nerve following stimulation of the sciatic nerve. The insertion of
injection and microneurography electrodes between stimulation and rec
ording sites produced a 20% decrease in the size of the CAP, which was
maintained for the 10 min duration of impalement. After withdrawal, t
he conduction block partially resolved. In other experiments, single-u
nit action potentials were recorded from L(4) and L(5) dorsal roots fo
llowing peripheral nerve stimulation. Microneurography electrodes inse
rted into the sciatic nerve produced conduction block in 50% of these
axons. When axons were blocked, anodal stimulation through the tungste
n electrode became more effective than cathodal stimulation. These res
ults suggest that a temporary conduction block occurs in a significant
number of myelinated fibers near the site df an inserted electrode.