Ja. Falconer et al., STROKE INPATIENT REHABILITATION - A COMPARISON ACROSS AGE-GROUPS, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 42(1), 1994, pp. 39-44
Objective: To examine and compare the inpatient stroke rehabilitation
experience of older adults (greater-than-or-equal-to 75 years) with th
at of young adults (< 65 years) and young-old adults (65-74 years). De
sign: Cross-sectional descriptive study. Setting: A large university-a
ffiliated free-standing rehabilitation hospital. Participants: 260 adu
lts who were admitted to inpatient stroke rehabilitation with a primar
y diagnosis of recent (< 120 days) stroke (ICD9 430-436). Variables: D
emographic data, diagnosis, time between stroke onset and rehabilitati
on admission, discharge disposition, and functional status on admissio
n and discharge were obtained from the patient's medical record. Treat
ment intensity and type, length of stay, and primary payment source da
ta were obtained from the patient's billing record. Three-month mortal
ity data were available from the hospital's routine follow-up survey.
Main Results: Compared with the younger adults (< 65 yrs and 65-75 yea
rs), the older adults (greater-than-or-equal-to 75 years) were admitte
d to rehabilitation earlier and with comparable cognitive but poorer m
otor function. Rehabilitation treatment intensity (per day) and type w
ere similar across age groups, but the older adults (greater-than-or-e
qual-to 75 years) had significantly shorter rehabilitation stays. Thre
e-month survival was comparable across age groups, but the older adult
s (greater-than-or-equal-to 75 years) had poorer motor function at dis
charge and were more often discharged to a nursing home or required a
paid caregiver. Conclusions: Age-associated factors may influence inpa
tient stroke rehabilitation referral, treatment, and outcome, particul
arly for patients over age 75. The cumulative effects of frailty and c
o-morbid disease upon stroke disability and treatment are possible exp
lanations for the findings. The study provides evidence of a need for
further investigation of stroke rehabilitation strategies for adults o
ver 75 years old.