G. Abbruzzese et al., MOTOR EVOKED-POTENTIALS FOLLOWING CERVICAL ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION IN BRACHIAL-PLEXUS LESIONS, Journal of neurology, 241(2), 1993, pp. 63-67
The diagnostic relevance of recording motor evoked potentials (MEPs) a
fter electrical stimulation of the cervical region, as compared with c
onventional needle electromyography (EMG), was evaluated in 26 patient
s with brachial plexus (BP) damage of different aetiology, severity an
d topography. MEP abnormalities (absence or latency increase) were obs
erved in at least one muscle of all the patients, with a global incide
nce of 61.5% of the muscles examined. Neurogenic EMG signs were presen
t in all but one patient with an incidence of 62.2% of the muscles exa
mined. Combining the two methods, the global incidence of abnormalitie
s rose to 69.9%. MEP abnormalities were consistent with the clinical t
opography and severity of BP lesions and were fairly parallel with EMG
findings. Recording MEPs after percutaneous electrical stimulation of
the cervical region may be regarded as a rapid, non-invasive method f
or quantitative electrophysiological assessment of BP damage.