Ophthalmoscopy is an essential part of a complete clinical examination
of a patient. However specific formal instruction in fundoscopy is ra
rely given to medical students. We decided to determine the value of e
xplicit teaching of ophthalmoscopy and devised and validated a rating
scale for assessing performance which was used to evaluate 29 first ye
ar clinical medical student volunteers at St. Bartholomew's Hospital M
edical College, before and after formal instruction in fundoscopy. The
competence of this group at ophthalmoscopoy was then compared to the
rest of their year (109 medical students) during the objective structu
red clinical end-of-year examination. Students formally instructed in
ophthalmoscopy showed an improved score after instruction (from 53% to
77%). They also performed better at fundoscopy than the rest of their
year (mean average score 64%), when tested 2 months later, suggesting
persistence of the training effect. However as a group they performed
no better than their peers at clinical skills other than ophthalmosco
py. We suggest that as fundoscopy is such an important clinical skill,
medical students should be given specific teaching, preferably in the
ir ophthalmology firm attachment, as we have shown that it results in
a persistent improvement in performance.