ACOUSTIC RHINOMETRY COMPARED WITH POSTERIOR RHINOMANOMETRY IN THE MEASUREMENT OF HISTAMINE-INDUCED AND BRADYKININ-INDUCED CHANGES IN NASAL AIRWAY PATENCY
Ce. Austin et Jc. Foreman, ACOUSTIC RHINOMETRY COMPARED WITH POSTERIOR RHINOMANOMETRY IN THE MEASUREMENT OF HISTAMINE-INDUCED AND BRADYKININ-INDUCED CHANGES IN NASAL AIRWAY PATENCY, British journal of clinical pharmacology, 37(1), 1994, pp. 33-37
1 Acoustic rhinometry is a relatively new method for objectively asses
sing nasal airway patency. In this paper we compare acoustic rhinometr
y with active posterior rhinomanometry. 2 Twenty normal healthy volunt
eers underwent nasal challenge with either histamine or bradykinin, 10
0 mug to 1000 mug, and responses were assessed by acoustic rhinometry.
A further 20 subjects received identical nasal challenges and respons
es were assessed by active posterior rhinomanometry. 3 On a subsequent
occasion, the subjects challenged previously with histamine, were giv
en the selective H-1-receptor antagonist, cetirizine, 10 mg orally, 3
h before repeat nasal challenge with histamine, 100-1000 mug. Again, r
esponses were assessed by active posterior rhinomanometry and acoustic
rhinometry. 4 The acoustic reflection measurements and the nasal airw
ay resistance measurements showed comparable, significant dose-related
changes in nasal patency to both histamine and bradykinin. Pretreatme
nt with cetirizine blocked the histamine-induced change in nasal paten
cy as measured by both methods. 5 We conclude that acoustic rhinometry
has a number of advantages over posterior rhinomanometry. It is quick
to perform, requires minimal subject co-operation and gives a reliabl
e objective, measurement of dose-related changes in nasal airway paten
cy before and after pharmacological treatment.