Jm. Chessells et al., A 2ND COURSE OF TREATMENT FOR CHILDHOOD ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC-LEUKEMIA - LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP IS NEEDED TO ASSESS RESULTS, British Journal of Haematology, 86(1), 1994, pp. 48-54
We report the results of long-term follow-up of 94 children who comple
ted treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) between 1974 and
1986 and subsequently experienced a bone marrow relapse before 1992.
91 children received further induction, intensification and CNS direct
ed therapy; 19 proceeded to BMT or ABMT and the remainder were treated
on one of three protocols which increased in intensity. The duration
of second remission improved significantly with increasing intensity o
f treatment and bone marrow transplantion was followed by fewer relaps
es than chemotherapy. Analysis of factors influencing the duration of
second remission showed that only length of first remission was of add
itional significance; the median duration of second remission being on
ly 19 months in children with a first remission of less than 4 years a
nd 62 months in those with longer first remissions. 29 children electi
vely stopped chemotherapy a second time but only 11 of these remain st
ill in second remission with recurrences occurring for up to 7 years f
rom the the time first relapse. Only three of the 24 long-term survivo
rs had no significant late effects of treatment; these were most marke
d in children who had received a second course of radiotherapy. We con
clude that very long follow-up is necessary to determine whether patie
nts may be successfully re-treated following late bone marrow relapse
and that all such treatment is associated with a high incidence of lat
e effects.