R. Benger et M. Forer, ENDONASAL DACRYOCYSTORHINOSTOMY - PRIMARY AND SECONDARY, Australian and New Zealand journal of ophthalmology, 21(3), 1993, pp. 157-159
An endonasal approach was used to restore lacrimal drainage in both pr
imary and secondary obstructions. Patients in the primary group had a
history of keloid scar formation, or wished to avoid a scar and declin
ed to have surgery performed via an external approach. Patients in the
secondary group had undergone one or more previous unsuccessful lacri
mal drainage repairs. A fibreoptic endonasal telescope, linked to a vi
deo monitor, and appropriate nasal and lacrimal instruments, were used
. The approach proved highly successful, in both anatomical and functi
onal terms, in each group. In the secondary group, the endonasal appro
ach allowed direct visualisation and repair of both nasal and lacrimal
causes of failure; this approach is our preference in this group. In
the primary group, endonasal instrumentation had no advantage over a c
onventional external operation, other than avoiding a scar. The applic
ation of laser technology may make the endonasal approach a realistic
option in primary DCRs as well.