Dl. Liu et Rc. Waag, TIME-SHIFT COMPENSATION OF ULTRASONIC PULSE FOCUS DEGRADATION USING LEAST-MEAN-SQUARE ERROR-ESTIMATES OF ARRIVAL TIME, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95(1), 1994, pp. 542-555
Focus degradation produced by abdominal wall has been compensated usin
g a least-mean-square error estimate of arrival time. The compensation
was performed on data from measurements of ultrasonic pulses from a c
urved transducer that emits a hemispheric wave and simulates a point s
ource. The pulse waveforms were measured in a two-dimensional aperture
after propagation through a water path and after propagation through
14 different specimens of human abdominal wall. Time histories of the
virtual point source were reconstructed by removing the time delays pr
oduced by geometric path differences and also removing time shifts pro
duced by propagation inhomogeneities in the case of compensation, find
ing the complex amplitudes of the Fourier harmonics across the apertur
e, calculating the Fraunhofer diffraction pattern of each harmonic, an
d summing the patterns. This process used a least-mean-square error so
lution for the relative delay expressed in terms of the arrival time d
ifferences between neighboring points and included an algorithm to det
ermine arrival time differences when correlation based estimates were
unsatisfactory due to dissimilarity of neighboring waveforms. Comparis
ons of reconstructed time histories in the image plane show that the -
10-dB effective radius of the focus for reception through abdominal w
all without compensation for inhomogeneities averaged 48% greater than
the corresponding average effective radius for ideal waveforms, while
time-shift compensation reduced the average - 10-dB effective radius
to a value that is only 4% greater than for reception of ideal wavefor
ms. The comparisons also indicate that the average ratio of energy out
side an ellipsoid defined by the - 10-dB effective widths to the energ
y inside that ellipsoid is 1.81 for uncompensated tissue path data and
that time-shift compensation reduced this average to 0.93, while the
corresponding average for ideal waveforms was found to be 0.35. These
results show that time-shift compensation yields a significant improve
ment over the uncompensated case although other factors must be consid
ered to achieve an ideal diffraction limited focus.