Tw. Bauer et al., AN INDIRECT COMPARISON OF 3RD-BODY WEAR IN RETRIEVED HYDROXYAPATITE-COATED, POROUS, AND CEMENTED FEMORAL COMPONENTS, Clinical orthopaedics and related research, (298), 1994, pp. 11-18
The osteoconductive properties of hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated titanium
implants are well documented, but eventual coating degradation may res
ult in HA particles adjacent to the substrate, and if the particles we
re to migrate into the joint space then accelerated polyethylene wear
might be expected. As an indirect indication of third-body wear, the a
uthors used laser interference microscopy to measure and compare surfa
ce roughness on modular heads from 15 clinically retrieved HA-coated f
emoral components, with heads from 15 retrieved uncemented (porous) an
d 15 cemented implants. The results showed increased median surface ro
ughness over initial manufacturer specifications in all groups, but th
e cobalt-chrome heads from the HA-coated group showed significantly le
ss surface roughness and less deep scratches than the heads from eithe
r the porous or uncemented group. Three-body wear appears to be a comm
on problem, but evidence available suggests that it is no more of a pr
oblem with HA-coated devices than porous or cemented.