DIFFERENTIATION OF CONSTRICTIVE PERICARDITIS FROM RESTRICTIVE CARDIOMYOPATHY BY DOPPLER TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC MEASUREMENTS OF RESPIRATORY VARIATIONS IN PULMONARY VENOUS FLOW
Al. Klein et al., DIFFERENTIATION OF CONSTRICTIVE PERICARDITIS FROM RESTRICTIVE CARDIOMYOPATHY BY DOPPLER TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC MEASUREMENTS OF RESPIRATORY VARIATIONS IN PULMONARY VENOUS FLOW, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 22(7), 1993, pp. 1935-1943
Objectives. The purpose of this study was to test the utility of measu
ring respiratory variation in pulmonary venous flow by transesophageal
echocardiography. Background. Respiratory variation of atrioventricul
ar and central venous flow velocities by Doppler echocardiography has
been used to differentiate constrictive pericarditis from restrictive
cardiomyopathy. Methods. We performed pulsed wave Doppler transesophag
eal echocardiography of the left or right pulmonary veins in 31 patien
ts with diastolic dysfunction. Fourteen patients had constrictive peri
carditis, and 17 had restrictive cardiomyopathy. We measured the pulmo
nary venous peak systolic and diastolic flow velocities and the systol
ic/diastolic flow ratio with transesophageal echocardiography during e
xpiration and inspiration. The percent change in Doppler flow velocity
from expiration to inspiration (%E) was calculated. Results. Pulmonar
y venous peak systolic how in both inspiration and expiration was grea
ter in constrictive pericarditis than in restrictive cardiomyopathy. T
he %E for peak systolic flow tended to be higher in constrictive peric
arditis (19% vs. 10%, p = 0.09). In contrast, pulmonary venous peak di
astolic flow during inspiration was lower in constrictive pericarditis
than in restrictive cardiomyopathy. The %E for peak diastolic flow wa
s larger in constrictive pericarditis (29% vs. 16%, p = 0.008). The pu
lmonary venous systolic/diastolic flow ratio was greater in constricti
ve pericarditis in both inspiration and expiration. The combination of
pulmonary venous systolic/diastolic flow ratio greater than or equal
to 0.65 in inspiration and a %E for peak diastolic flow greater than o
r equal to 40% correctly classified 86% of patients with constrictive
pericarditis. Conclusions. The relatively larger pulmonary venous syst
olic/diastolic flow ratio and greater respiratory variation in pulmona
ry venous systolic, and especially diastolic, flow velocities by trans
esophageal echocardiography can be useful signs in distinguishing cons
trictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy.