M. Zuckerman et Sc. Kieffer, RACE DIFFERENCES IN FACE-ISM - DOES FACIAL PROMINENCE IMPLY DOMINANCE, Journal of personality and social psychology, 66(1), 1994, pp. 86-92
It was hypothesized that visual depictions that are lower in ''face-is
m'' (i.e., showing less of the face and more of the body) elicit impre
ssions of lower power. It was thus predicted that depictions of a disc
riminated-against minority would be lower in face-ism than those of a
dominant majority. Four data sets showed lower face-ism in visual disp
lays of Blacks than in those of Whites: Pictures from American and Eur
opean periodicals, American portrait paintings, and American stamps (t
he portraits and the stamps showed the effect only when created by Whi
tes). The race difference in face-ism for the American periodicals was
maintained even when the race difference in status was held constant.
A final study showed that high face-ism photographs received higher d
ominance ratings than low face-ism photographs. Face can be used to im
ply confrontation (e.g., face-to-face)-a meaning that is consistent wi
th the link between face-ism and dominance.