Cs. Carver et Me. Scheier, SITUATIONAL COPING AND COPING DISPOSITIONS IN A STRESSFUL TRANSACTION, Journal of personality and social psychology, 66(1), 1994, pp. 184-195
After reporting dispositional coping styles, students reported situati
onal coping and 4 classes of affect (from threat, challenge, harm, and
benefit appraisals) 2 days before an exam, after the exam but before
grades were posted, and after posting of grades. Coping did not predic
t lower levels of future distress; indeed, some coping seemed to induc
e feelings of threat. Feelings of harm before the exam induced several
kinds of coping after the exam, mostly dysfunctional. Confidence abou
t one's grade was a better predictor of emotions throughout than was c
oping. Dispositional coping predicted comparable situational coping at
low-moderate levels in most cases. Coping dispositions did not reliab
ly predict emotions, however, with these exceptions: Dispositional den
ial was related to threat, as was dispositional use of social support;
dispositional use of alcohol was related to both threat and harm.