Mwmm. Ruijten et al., COMPARISON OF 2 TECHNIQUES TO MEASURE THE MOTOR-NERVE CONDUCTION-VELOCITY DISTRIBUTION, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology, 89(6), 1993, pp. 375-381
Hopf's technique to measure the distribution of motor nerve conduction
velocities (DMCV) has been compared with the technique introduced by
Ingram et al. in the peroneal nerve of 28 healthy subjects aged 41.2 (
S.D. 8.4) years. Twenty subjects were examined twice. Both techniques
yielded an equal DMCV and equally reproducible results. Group mean vel
ocities for the slowest examined (MNCV95) motor nerve fibres were 39.0
m/sec (S.D. 3.3) for Ingram's technique and 38.6 (S.D. 3.6) for Hopf'
s technique. The conventional MNCV was always slower than the velocity
of the 5% fastest fibres estimated from the DMCV. Ingram's technique
may have a number of merits which may have been obscured by measuremen
t in the peroneal nerve, which may be of advantage in shorter nerve se
gments or faster nerve fibres. On the basis of our data in the peronea
l nerve of healthy subjects no preference can be given for either of t
he techniques.