Da. Fullerton et al., HEMODYNAMIC ADVANTAGE OF LEFT ATRIAL EPINEPHRINE ADMINISTRATION AFTERCARDIAC OPERATIONS, The Annals of thoracic surgery, 56(6), 1993, pp. 1263-1266
Cardiac surgical patients frequently require catecholamines, typically
administered via the central venous circulation. Potential. disadvant
ages of this route of administration include catecholamine metabolism
by the pulmonary vascular bed before gaining access to the heart and p
ulmonary vasoconstriction producing increased pulmonary vascular resis
tance. We therefore prospectively compared administration of epinephri
ne via the left atrium versus central venous administration of epineph
rine with particular interest in: cardiac output, mean pulmonary arter
y pressure, and pulmonary vascular resistance. Fifteen consecutive aor
tocoronary bypass patients were studied after cardiopulmonary bypass.
Epinephrine (mean dose, 0.07 +/- 0.02 mu g.kg(-1) min(-1)) was adminis
tered via the central venous route, then via the left atrium, then via
the central venous route again. Hemodynamic data were collected 10 mi
nutes after changing the route of administration. Left atrial administ
ration of epinephrine produced a 35% greater cardiac output, 25% lower
pulmonary artery pressure, and 32% lower pulmonary vascular resistanc
e when compared with central venous administration (all significant; p
< 0.05). Left atrial epinephrine administration may offer hemodynamic
advantage in cardiac surgical patients in whom central venous adminis
tration does not produce an adequate cardiac output or in patients wit
h pulmonary hypertension to avoid any further increase in pulmonary va
scular resistance.