We tested three antireflux double-J stents and compared them with comm
on double-J stents in ex vivo canine urinary systems. At a physiologic
flow rate, the drainage function of the antireflux stents proved to b
e sufficient; however, at a supraphysiological flow rate, drainage was
inferior to that of the common double-J stent. Our reflux study demon
strated high-grade reflux with the common double-J stent, which transm
itted more than 90% of the bladder pressure to the renal pelvis. The a
ntireflux stents prevented this to a certain degree by both a reductio
n in and a delay of pressure transmission to the renal pelvis. In prel
iminary clinical trials, vesicorenal reflux was not detectable radiolo
gically with the antireflux stents.