Js. Fitzsimon et al., RESPONSE OF THE PUPIL TO TROPICAMIDE IS NOT A RELIABLE TEST FOR ALZHEIMER-DISEASE, Archives of neurology, 54(2), 1997, pp. 155-159
Objective: To confirm the putative hypersensitivity of the pupil to a
weak mydriatic in persons with Alzheimer dementia. Design: Twenty pati
ents with Alzheimer dementia and 20 control subjects were examined. Au
tomated binocular infrared pupillography was performed in the dark aft
er instillation of 0.01% tropicamide or placebo. Ocular penetration of
eye drops was assessed simultaneously using 2% fluorescein sodium as
a tracer. Setting: Rochester, Minn. Subjects: Twenty patients and 20 c
ognitively normal central subjects from the Alzheimer's Disease Patien
t Registry of the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn. Main Outcome Measure:
Percent change in the diameter of the pupil following topical ocular i
nstillation of a diluted concentration of the mydriatic drug tropicami
de and penetration of topically applied fluorescein into the aqueous h
umor. Results: No statistically significant difference was found betwe
en patients with Alzheimer disease and control subjects in either the
mydriatic response of the pupil or in the rate of penetration of topic
ally applied fluorescein. Conclusion: No evidence of pupillary hyperse
nsitivity to an anticholinergic mydriatic drug was found in patients w
ith Alzheimer disease or any evidence that this putative hypersensitiv
ity could be used as an early, simple diagnostic test for Alzheimer di
sease.