VULNERABILITY TO PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS - EMPIRICAL AND CONCEPTUAL DISTINCTIONS BETWEEN MEASURES OF NEUROTICISM AND NEGATIVE AFFECT

Citation
J. Mclennan et Gw. Bates, VULNERABILITY TO PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS - EMPIRICAL AND CONCEPTUAL DISTINCTIONS BETWEEN MEASURES OF NEUROTICISM AND NEGATIVE AFFECT, Psychological reports, 73(3), 1993, pp. 1315-1323
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Psychology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00332941
Volume
73
Issue
3
Year of publication
1993
Part
2
Pages
1315 - 1323
Database
ISI
SICI code
0033-2941(1993)73:3<1315:VTPD-E>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
In two studies, 97 and 176 individuals (47 men and 50 women, M age 34. 2 yr.; and 88 men and 88 women, M age 34.8) known to have experienced a recent period of psychological distress were compared with otherwise similar individuals who reported no such experience on measures of ne uroticism, extraversion, and positive and negative affect. In both stu dies, the neuroticism measure was a significant independent discrimina tor between the groups while the negative affect measure was not. This suggests that (a) measures of neuroticism tap factors additional to t hose tapped by scales measuring only levels of characteristic negative affect and (b) these factors are related to individual differences in vulnerability to psychological distress.