Pc. Deedwania et al., EVIDENCE-BASED, COST-EFFECTIVE RISK STRATIFICATION AND MANAGEMENT AFTER MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION, Archives of internal medicine, 157(3), 1997, pp. 273-280
Current management of patients after an acute myocardial infarction (A
MI) reflects a variety of approaches ranging from conservative to aggr
essive. Although each method is appropriate in certain subgroups, thei
r application frequently lacks a scientific basis. Current, clinically
relevant, evidence-based practice guidelines are needed for secondary
prevention for survivors after an AMI. To meet this need, the Califor
nia Cardiology Working Group was assembled to evaluate the available d
ata from clinical trials and other published studies and develop evide
nce-based, cost-effective guidelines for clinicians to use as a basis
for patient management after an AMI. The group consisted of 18 members
, including cardiologists from academic institutions and physicians wo
rking in cardiac intensive care, private practices, and managed care s
ettings, representing a broad spectrum of expertise pertaining to pati
ents who have had an AMI. The members had expertise in cardiac intensi
ve care, interventional cardiology, nuclear cardiology, lipid disorder
s, echocardiography, and cardiac rehabilitation. The intended audience
for these practice guidelines includes all physicians who treat survi
vors of MI, A literature review of all relevant clinical trials and ot
her published data about the natural history after AMI and the effects
of current therapeutic modalities are discussed herein. Case historie
s served as models for application of the literature-based data. The r
ecommendations for management were reached by consensus vote based on
the scientific evidence. When more than 1 management option applied, t
his was recognized in the recommendations. The recommendations accompa
ny the text.