The objective of this study was to present and illustrate a technique
for combining failure-time data from various sources, adjusting for di
fferences in case-mix among studies. Based on the proportional-hazards
model and the actuarial life-table approach, the method used assumes
that the variation across studies is in part due to heterogeneity of t
he case-mix and adjusts for the case-mix before pooling results. As an
example, the technique is applied to life-table data from six selecte
d papers reporting patency of affected arteries following femoropoplit
eal angioplasty. Published 4- and 6-year patency results ranged from 2
5% to 58%, with a pooled five-year cumulative patency rate (without ad
justment for case-mix) of 45% (+/- 2%). The populations in these studi
es, however, differed markedly in the prevalence of factors with progn
ostic value: type of lesion and distal runoff vessels. After adjustmen
t for these differences in case-mix, the pooled five-year patency rate
s ranged from 60% (+/- 2%) for patients with stenotic lesions and good
runoff to 24% (+/- 9%) for those with occlusion and poor runoff. The
authors conclude that pooling studies without considering the effect o
f case-mix yields an average result with inappropriately narrow confid
ence intervals that does not reflect the variability across subgroups.
The presented technique provides a method for combining failure-time
data, adjusting for case-mix.