Da. Larson et al., CURRENT RADIOSURGERY PRACTICE - RESULTS OF AN ASTRO SURVEY, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 28(2), 1994, pp. 523-526
Citations number
1
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Purpose: Although there is increasing interest in radiosurgery, little
quantitative data regarding current patterns of radiosurgery practice
are available. We developed a radiosurgery questionnaire to obtain in
formation on radiosurgery practice. Methods and Materials: We distribu
ted the questionnaire to the entire membership of the American Society
of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology in early 1993. Responses were o
btained from 74 facilities that practice radiosurgery, corresponding t
o over 6000 treatments carried out since 1983 by 135 radiation oncolog
ists and 130 physicists. Results: Most respondents were found to work
within a multidisciplinary team, consisting of the following specialis
ts (average hours devoted per patient on day of treatment in parenthes
es): radiation oncologist (3.8), neurosurgeon (3.2), physicist (6.1),
radiologist (0.7), nurse (2.7), other (3.0). On average, neurosurgeons
and nurses,who perform Gamma Knife radiosurgery devote significantly
more time-per-patient on the day of treatment than their peers who per
form linac radiosurgery. On average, less experienced radiation oncolo
gists and physicists (less than or equal to 24 months experience, or l
ess than or equal to 50 patients treated) devote significantly more ti
me-per-patient on the day of treatment than their more experienced pee
rs. Although there are many more linac radiosurgery facilities than Ga
mma Knife facilities, on average the number of patients treated per mo
nth per facility is significantly larger at the latter. On average, fo
llow-up responsibilities are nearly equally shared by radiation oncolo
gists and neurosurgeons, except at Gamma Knife facilities, where neuro
surgeons assume a larger percentage of follow-up responsibility. The p
ercentages of patients treated at linac facilities for metastases or p
rimary CNS malignancy are larger than the corresponding percentages at
Gamma Knife facilities; the opposite is true for arteriovenous malfor
mation, acoustic neuroma, and meningioma. Conclusion: Current radiosur
gery practice usually involves a team approach, with participation of
specialists from radiation oncology, neurosurgery, physics, radiology,
and nursing. The average number of M.D. and Ph.D. hours required per
treatment on the day of radiosurgery is high.