M. Niaz et Rh. Logie, WORKING-MEMORY, MENTAL-CAPACITY AND SCIENCE-EDUCATION - TOWARDS AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE WORKING-MEMORY OVERLOAD HYPOTHESIS, Oxford review of education, 19(4), 1993, pp. 511-525
Researchers in science education recognise the importance of informati
on processing capacity as a constraint on the abilities and achievemen
ts of science students. This constraint has been referred to as 'menta
l capacity' or 'working memory capacity' with the latter leading to th
e so-called 'working memory overload hypothesis'. However, rarely have
researchers in this area been explicit as to the nature or theory of
the mental capacity or the working memory system to which these terms
refer. In this paper we outline two possible models which have proved
useful in studies a information processing in other domains. The first
model (of mental capacity developed by Pascual-Leone and his colleagu
es has been applied in science education with varying degrees of succe
ss, The second model (of working memory) developed by Baddeley and his
colleagues has been very successful in accounting for a wide range of
cognitive activity, although it has not been applied to science educa
tion hitherto. We conclude that consideration of elements of the worki
ng memory framework may well prove fruitful in science education.