MORAL HAZARD, EXTERNALITIES, AND COMPENSATION FOR CROP DAMAGES FROM WILDLIFE

Citation
K. Rollins et Hc. Briggs, MORAL HAZARD, EXTERNALITIES, AND COMPENSATION FOR CROP DAMAGES FROM WILDLIFE, Journal of environmental economics and management, 31(3), 1996, pp. 368-386
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Business,Economics,"Environmental Studies
ISSN journal
00950696
Volume
31
Issue
3
Year of publication
1996
Pages
368 - 386
Database
ISI
SICI code
0095-0696(1996)31:3<368:MHEACF>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
A principal-multiple agent model is used to examine wildlife damage ab atement and compensation programs in a setting in which farmers suffer damages and hunters use the wildlife for recreational purposes. In ad dition to externalities inherent in abatement, abatement/compensation policy confronts the issue of moral hazard. By representing the princi pal as a wildlife management authority who acts on behalf of hunters, we investigate contracts in which transfers of more or less severe hun ting regulations, a public good that aids in dispersing wildlife, and monetary payments from hunting license fees can be used to overcome mo ral hazard. (C) 1996 Academic Press, Inc.