S. Clement et Rt. Lovell, COMPARISON OF PROCESSING YIELD AND NUTRIENT COMPOSITION OF CULTURED NILE TILAPIA (OREOCHROMIS-NILOTICUS) AND CHANNEL CATFISH (ICTALURUS-PUNCTATUS), Aquaculture, 119(2-3), 1994, pp. 299-310
Nile tilapia and channel catfish were grown from fingerling to harvest
size with the same commercial diet. The catfish were harvested from a
0.04-h earthen pond at an average size of 610 g and the tilapia were
taken from 1-m3 circular raceways at an average size of 585 g. Both gr
oups of fish were fed to satiation for a 180-day summer feeding period
. Twenty fish were randomly collected from each group for determinatio
n of processing yield and 10 fish were collected from each group for d
etermination of selected nutrient composition. Processing yield (total
fish weight minus weight of head, skin and viscera) was lower for til
apia (51.0% as compared to 60.6% for channel catfish). Fillet yield wa
s also lower for tilapia (2 5.4% as compared to 30.9%). Fat content of
fillet was lower for tilapia (5.7 g/100 g as compared to 7.4 g/100 g)
. Protein content of fillet was higher for tilapia (20.3 g/100 g compa
red to 17.3 g/100 g). Caloric value of fillet was lower for tilapia (1
39 kcal/100 g compared to 144 kcal/100 g). Fatty acid composition of f
illet lipids was similar for the two species; monounsaturates comprise
d an average of 54.6 g/100 g of total fatty acids and n-3 highly unsat
urated fatty acids comprised an average of 2.2 g/100 g of total fatty
acids. Cholesterol contents of fillet were 31.3 mg/100 g for tilapia a
nd 37.1 mg/100 g for catfish. Amino acid content was similar for the t
wo species. Mineral composition of fillet was similar except that tila
pia had higher concentrations of sodium and magnesium and catfish had
higher concentrations of potassium and phosphorus.