Jr. Current et Je. Storbeck, A MULTIOBJECTIVE APPROACH TO DESIGN FRANCHISE OUTLET NETWORKS, The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 45(1), 1994, pp. 71-81
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Management,"Operatione Research & Management Science","Operatione Research & Management Science
The economic goals and the resulting locational objectives of a franch
isor and its individual franchisees are frequently in conflict. For ex
ample, one goal of the franchisor is to maximize system-wide market co
verage, while the corresponding goal of the franchisee is to maximize
his or her individual market share. Consequently, the optimal facility
siting scheme from one perspective may be suboptimal from the other.
That is, the facility siting scheme which maximizes system-wide covera
ge will not necessarily maximize the market shares of the individual f
ranchises which make up the system. In this paper we introduce a multi
objective integer programming model to design franchise networks. The
model selects franchise locations and identifies individual franchise
market areas. Constraints in the formulation guarantee that all franch
ise locations are assigned at least a minimal threshold market area wi
th sufficient demand to ensure economic survival. An underlying assump
tion of the model is that a rationing mechanism exists to assign deman
d to various franchise locations. Consequently, the model is most appr
opriate for service delivery franchises in which the franchisor can de
fine and enforce exclusive franchise territories for the various franc
hise outlets. The purpose of this model is to generate alternative sit
ing configurations which demonstrate the inherent trade-offs between t
he objectives of the franchisor and the individual franchisees. Given
these various location alternatives, it is expected that the franchiso
r will then evaluate them in terms of other criteria such as the likel
ihood of the individual franchisee's success, pricing strategies for t
he various sites, total costs, total profit, and the effects of the re
sponse of competitors. Consequently, the proposed model should be view
ed as an aid for one aspect of the decision process, i.e. the generati
on of alternative courses of action.