Rs. Abulhosn et al., PASSIVE SMOKE EXPOSURE IMPAIRS RECOVERY AFTER HOSPITALIZATION FOR ACUTE ASTHMA, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine, 151(2), 1997, pp. 135-139
Objective: To determine if children with chronic asthma hospitalized f
or an acute exacerbation experienced prolonged clinical recovery after
hospital discharge if they returned to a home environment in which th
ey were exposed to environmental tobacco smoke. Design: A prospective
longitudinal study. Setting: Children's Hospital and Medical Center, S
eattle, Wash. Patients: Patients admitted to the emergency department
of the Children's Hospital and Medical Center with the single diagnosi
s of asthma (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision
[ICD-9] code 493). Results: Twenty-two children with acute asthma were
sequentially enrolled in the study and longitudinally observed betwee
n February and June 1994. The tobacco-smoking group (n=11) was defined
as having at least 1 smoker in the home. The nonsmoking group (n=11)
had no environmental tobacco smoke exposure at home. The 2 groups were
similar in age, sex, preadmission chronic asthma severity, and immedi
ate predischarge asthma status. Discharge medication use was similar i
n the 2 groups. During a 1 month follow-up period, the tobacco-smoking
group had a significantly greater number of symptomatic days than the
nonsmoking group (P<.05). Of the children in the nonsmoking group, 9
(82%) had less than I symptomatic day per week compared with 3 (27%) i
n the tobacco-smoking group. beta(2)-Agonist bronchodilator use declin
ed significantly (P<.001) during follow-up in the nonsmoking group but
not in the tobacco-smoking group, despite similar anti-inflammatory d
rug therapy in both groups. Conclusions: Recovery by children after ho
spitalization for acute asthma is impaired by environmental tobacco sm
oke exposure when the period of recovery is characterized by persisten
t respiratory symptoms and use of asthma medication for symptomatic re
lief. These findings underscore the need to limit environmental tobacc
o smoke exposure in children with asthma and argue for closer physicia
n follow-up of those children returning to a home environment in which
smokers are present.