In comparison to 29 non bitten animals, severe tail biting was found t
o decrease the daily weight gain (DWG) by 25% in 8 fattening pigs duri
ng the period of biting. However, when comparing the weight gain of th
e lifetime between bitten and non bitten pigs, no influence of the tai
l biting was found. It is of interest that severily wounded pigs were
parenterally treated with prokainpenicillin G for 3 consecutive days i
n connection with the tail biting, which could be suggested to promote
the growth by reducing the influence of infections gained by the tail
biting as well as of other infections present in herds rearing conven
tional pigs. Despite penicillin treatment, abscesses were more frequen
tly recorded in tail bitten pigs than in non bitten animals. The tail
biting was not equally distributed between the sexes, as barrows were
more frequently bitten than gilts. Among the unbitten pigs, barrows we
re also found to grow faster than gilts. Indeed, when comparing tail b
itten and non bitten barrows, a negative influence of tail biting on D
WG was not only shown during the period of biting, but could also be m
onitored as a reduced DWG from that period until slaughter by 11% and
during lifetime by 5% (the tail bitten gilts were too few to allow sta
tistical calculations). These results clearly indicate that tail bitin
g affects the growth rate of the lifetime despite penicillin treatment
. However, it should be stressed that this decreased lifetime DWG may
not be monitored when evaluating abattoir data because the sex distrib
ution of the pigs may not be known in such materials.