IMPACT OF ELECTRICAL CARDIOVERSION FOR ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION ON LEFT ATRIAL APPENDAGE FUNCTION AND SPONTANEOUS ECHO CONTRAST - CHARACTERIZATION BY SIMULTANEOUS TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
Ra. Grimm et al., IMPACT OF ELECTRICAL CARDIOVERSION FOR ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION ON LEFT ATRIAL APPENDAGE FUNCTION AND SPONTANEOUS ECHO CONTRAST - CHARACTERIZATION BY SIMULTANEOUS TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 22(5), 1993, pp. 1359-1366
Objectives. This study assessed the function of the left atrial append
age in the pericardioversion period to gain insights into mechanisms i
nvolved in thromboembolism after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.
Background. Systemic embolization associated with electrical cardiove
rsion of atrial fibrillation is thought to originate from the left atr
ium or left atrial appendage, or both. However, the mechanism involved
is poorly understood. Methods. We studied left atrial appendage funct
ion with transesophageal echocardiography in 20 patients with atrial f
ibrillation before and after successful electrical cardioversion. We m
easured left atrial appendage emptying and filling velocities by pulse
d wave Doppler echocardiography, characterized Doppler emptying patter
ns, measured atrial appendage areas and assessed the presence or absen
ce of spontaneous echo contrast or thrombus. Results. Organized left a
trial appendage function returned in 16 (80%) of 20 patients immediate
ly after cardioversion. Atrial appendage emptying velocities before ca
rdioversion were greater in patients without (0.39 +/- 0.02 m/s) than
in those with (0.25 +/- 0.12 m/s) spontaneous echo contrast (p = 0.045
). Furthermore, emptying velocities before cardioversion were signific
antly greater than late diastolic emptying velocities after cardiovers
ion (0.31 +/- 0.15 vs. 0.14 +/- 0.12 m/s, p = 0.0001), as well as in b
oth the group with (0.25 +/- 0.12 vs. 0.13 +/- 0.13 m/s, p = 0.001) an
d the group without (0.39 +/- 0.02 vs. 0.15 +/- 0.12 m/s, p = 0.01) sp
ontaneous echo contrast. In addition, left atrial and atrial appendage
spontaneous echo contrast developed in 4 of 20 patients and increased
in intensity in 3 of 20 patients in the immediate postcardioversion p
eriod. Conclusions. Organized left atrial appendage function returns i
n most patients immediately after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation
. However, its function is impaired compared with that before cardiove
rsion. Furthermore, spontaneous echo contrast increased in 7 (35%) of
20 patients after cardioversion. These observations suggest that stunn
ed left atrial appendage function after cardioversion may predispose t
he chamber to thrombus formation, which may play a role in the mechani
sm involved in the occurrence of embolization after cardioversion.