The notion of joint stiffness as commonly studied in biomechanics and
motor control is compared with the physical definition of stiffness. T
he importance of elastic deformation and storage of elastic energy is
stressed. Different terms are suggested in order to differentiate betw
een experimentally observed relations between joint angle and torque t
hat are likely to have different nature. A review of studies measuring
stiffness of joint subcomponents and intact joints is presented. We s
uggest to either abandon the term 'joint stiffness' as misleading or t
o state up front stiffness of which of the joint components or subsyst
ems is analyzed in each particular study. We also suggest that each st
udy of 'joint stiffness' should clearly state to what extent the resul
ts are defined by the system's properties and to what extent they are
reflections of the particular experimental procedure.