DIFFERENTIAL INHIBITION OF CUTANEOUS T-CELL-MEDIATED REACTIONS AND EPIDERMAL-CELL PROLIFERATION BY CYCLOSPORINE-A, FK-506, AND RAPAMYCIN

Authors
Citation
Ji. Duncan, DIFFERENTIAL INHIBITION OF CUTANEOUS T-CELL-MEDIATED REACTIONS AND EPIDERMAL-CELL PROLIFERATION BY CYCLOSPORINE-A, FK-506, AND RAPAMYCIN, Journal of investigative dermatology, 102(1), 1994, pp. 84-88
Citations number
38
Categorie Soggetti
Dermatology & Venereal Diseases
ISSN journal
0022202X
Volume
102
Issue
1
Year of publication
1994
Pages
84 - 88
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-202X(1994)102:1<84:DIOCTR>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
Although cyclosporin A is a highly effective treatment for several ski n disorders, particularly psoriasis, its use in dermatology appears li mited due to drug-induced hypertension and nephrotoxicity. Newer, simi lar-acting anti-T-cell agents such as FK-506 and rapamycin may be more effective; therefore a comparison was made with cyclosporin A to asse ss their inhibitory action on T-cell responses and keratinocyte prolif eration. Using a guinea-pig model of delayed-type hypersensitivity to dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB), drugs were given systemically (25 mg/kg c yclosporin A, rapamycin; 2.5 mg/kg FK-506) and topically (0.02% and 2% ) at the time of DNFB challenge or several hours after and were assess ed with respect to erythema and the numbers of infiltrating T lymphocy tes entering skin-challenge sites. FK-506, at all concentrations, sign ificantly inhibited both T-cell infiltration and skin reddening when u sed by both routes. Rapamycin displayed no inhibitory effect, whereas cyclosporin A suppressed the erythema given systemically. The inhibiti on of normal human keratinocyte growth by the drugs assessed using a p rotein dye-binding assay. After 2 weeks, FK-506 had no effect, whereas cyclosporin A and rapamycin both inhibited keratinocyte growth in a d ose-dependent fashion and almost equivalently in serum-containing and serum-free keratinocyte growth medium. The findings showed that in viv o only FK-506 suppressed T-cell involvement in sensitized animals. In contrast, it failed to have any effect on keratinocyte growth, whereas rapamycin was more potent cyclosporin A in inhibiting their prolifera tion. The future benefit of these drugs in dermatology may ultimately lie in their combined use.