The Socratic method uses systematic questioning and inductive reasonin
g to help clients derive universal definitions. The present manuscript
describes inductive reasoning as used in psychotherapy. Inductive rea
soning can be based on enumerative generalizations, analogical compari
sons, and eliminative causal reasoning. Enumerative generalizations us
e pattern identification to support a conclusion about an entire group
of events. Analogical comparisons help clients transfer knowledge fro
m familiar to novel situations. Eliminative causal reasoning involves
manipulating environmental conditions to examine possible causes of sp
ecific problematic events. After a probable cause has been identified,
it can be modified through treatment. The clinical utility and fallac
ies of logical reasoning are discussed as they apply to each of the th
ree forms of inductive reasoning. In general, inductive reasoning play
s a central role in the Socratic method and can be a valuable tool in
psychotherapy.