The clinical and pathologic staging of prostate cancer involves determ
ination of the anatomic extent and burden of tumor based on the best a
vailable data. Two major classification schemes are currently used: th
e modified American system and the TNM system [primary tumor (T), regi
onal lymph node (N), and metastases (M)]. Both systems stratify patien
ts according to the method of tumor detection, separating nonpalpable
''incidental'' prostate cancers detected during transurethral resectio
n for clinically benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and palpable cance
rs detected by digital rectal examination. These staging systems also
recognize nonpalpable tumors detected by an elevated serum prostate-sp
ecific antigen (PSA) level or an abnormal transrectal ultrasound image
. Current staging is limited by a significant level of clinical unders
taging (up to 59%, in our experience) and over-staging ( up to 5%) acc
ording to comparison with pathologic examination of resected specimens
. Proposed improvements in staging include preoperative systematic sex
tant biopsies to assess tumor volume, volume-based prognostic index, a
nd a multiple prognostic index. In this report, we evaluate the curren
t aspects of clinical and pathologic staging of prostate cancer with e
mphasis on the early stages in which there is the greatest chance of c
ure. (C) 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.