METAANALYSIS EVALUATION OF THE IMPACT OF THYROTROPIN RECEPTOR ANTIBODIES ON LONG-TERM REMISSION AFTER MEDICAL THERAPY OF GRAVES-DISEASE

Citation
U. Feldtrasmussen et al., METAANALYSIS EVALUATION OF THE IMPACT OF THYROTROPIN RECEPTOR ANTIBODIES ON LONG-TERM REMISSION AFTER MEDICAL THERAPY OF GRAVES-DISEASE, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 78(1), 1994, pp. 98-102
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology & Metabolism
ISSN journal
0021972X
Volume
78
Issue
1
Year of publication
1994
Pages
98 - 102
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-972X(1994)78:1<98:MEOTIO>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
Patients with the hyperthyroidism of Graves' disease (GDH) have a high er risk of relapse after antithyroid drug therapy (ATD) therapy when T SH receptor antibodies (TRAb) are positive, but the practical clinical implication of TRAb as a predictor for relapse is still much debated. This study was undertaken to investigate by meta-analysis the results from the literature on the use of TRAb as predictor of long term (i.e . at least 1 yr) relapse after ATD. Eighteen publications from 1975-19 91 fulfilled the criteria of 1) availability of TRAb at the end of ATD treatment, 2) at least 1 yr of follow-up after ATD, 3) data presentat ion in a form suitable for mete-analysis, and 4) no other thyroid-rela ted therapy during the follow-up period. The 10 prospective studies, 5 of which measured TSH binding inhibiting immunoglobulins (total n = 5 97) and 5 of which measured thyroid-stimulating antibodies (n = 340), were computed together because no significant differences were found. In contrast, retrospective and prospective studies differed. In the pr ospective studies, the odds reduction of relapse showed 65% less risk of relapse when TRAb were absent compared to that in TRAb-positive pat ients (P < 0.00001). The present mete-analysis has, thus, confirmed in a large number of patients (n = 1524) that absence of TRAb is signifi cantly protective against relapse of GDH after ATD treatment. However, 25% of the patients are ''misclassified,'' and the main questions ari sing from the study are, therefore, the following. 1) Is it worthwhile to use TRAb as predictor of relapse? 2) Should patients with GDH cont inue ATD until TRAb becomes negative, rather than for a fixed period? The available methods for TRAb do not allow sufficiently high predicti on of relapse or remission after ATD for the individual patient.