Re. Clark et al., MEASURING RESOURCE USE IN ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS - DETERMINING THE SOCIAL COSTS OF MENTAL-ILLNESS, Journal of mental health administration, 21(1), 1994, pp. 32-41
Concern over costs associated with mental disorders has led to an incr
ease in the number of economic evaluations of treatment interventions;
unfortunately, methods for measuring resource use have not kept pace
with this concern. Although it is well-known that a significant propor
tion of the costs associated with mental illness are for resources oth
er than treatment, program evaluators and researchers often count only
treatment costs in cost-effectiveness comparisons. Further, existing
methods for measuring resource use are plagued by faulty assumptions a
bout resource use, poor validity and reliability, and difficulties qua
ntifying resource use. The authors discuss these problems and suggest
five ways of improving measurement of nontreatment resources: clarifyi
ng assumptions, using multiple data sources,flexible data collection s
trategies, methods for improving the accuracy of recall, and an episod
ic approach to measurement.