I. Fumagalli et B. Hammer, CISAPRIDE VERSUS METOCLOPRAMIDE IN THE TREATMENT OF FUNCTIONAL DYSPEPSIA - A DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARATIVE TRIAL, Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology, 29(1), 1994, pp. 33-37
The efficacy and tolerability of cisapride (5 mg three times daily) an
d metoclopramide (10 mg three times daily) were evaluated in a randomi
zed double-blind trial in patients with functional dyspepsia. Sixty pa
tients, equally distributed in the two groups, entered the trial. Afte
r 4 weeks of treatment there was a significant improvement of symptom
severity versus base line (p < 0.001) in both groups. The percentage o
f responders (with no or only mild symptoms) was 87% in the cisapride
group and 77% in the metoclopramide group (no statistically significan
t intergroup difference). At the follow-up visit 2 weeks after complet
ion of the trial this response rate was significantly higher in the ci
sapride group (73%) than in the metoclopramide group (47%) (p < 0.05).
Four of the patients receiving cisapride and 2 of the patients receiv
ing metoclopramide reported adverse events. On assessment of extrapyri
midal symptoms, relevant clinical values were found in one patient rec
eiving metoclopramide. Increased prolactin concentrations were observe
d in seven patients of the metoclopramide group versus only 1 of the c
isapride group (p < 0.05). The present data indicate that during the 2
weeks after completion of treatment in patients with functional dyspe
psia, cisapride may result in a better, more sustained overall respons
e when compared with metoclopramide.