CISAPRIDE VERSUS METOCLOPRAMIDE IN THE TREATMENT OF FUNCTIONAL DYSPEPSIA - A DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARATIVE TRIAL

Citation
I. Fumagalli et B. Hammer, CISAPRIDE VERSUS METOCLOPRAMIDE IN THE TREATMENT OF FUNCTIONAL DYSPEPSIA - A DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARATIVE TRIAL, Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology, 29(1), 1994, pp. 33-37
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
ISSN journal
00365521
Volume
29
Issue
1
Year of publication
1994
Pages
33 - 37
Database
ISI
SICI code
0036-5521(1994)29:1<33:CVMITT>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
The efficacy and tolerability of cisapride (5 mg three times daily) an d metoclopramide (10 mg three times daily) were evaluated in a randomi zed double-blind trial in patients with functional dyspepsia. Sixty pa tients, equally distributed in the two groups, entered the trial. Afte r 4 weeks of treatment there was a significant improvement of symptom severity versus base line (p < 0.001) in both groups. The percentage o f responders (with no or only mild symptoms) was 87% in the cisapride group and 77% in the metoclopramide group (no statistically significan t intergroup difference). At the follow-up visit 2 weeks after complet ion of the trial this response rate was significantly higher in the ci sapride group (73%) than in the metoclopramide group (47%) (p < 0.05). Four of the patients receiving cisapride and 2 of the patients receiv ing metoclopramide reported adverse events. On assessment of extrapyri midal symptoms, relevant clinical values were found in one patient rec eiving metoclopramide. Increased prolactin concentrations were observe d in seven patients of the metoclopramide group versus only 1 of the c isapride group (p < 0.05). The present data indicate that during the 2 weeks after completion of treatment in patients with functional dyspe psia, cisapride may result in a better, more sustained overall respons e when compared with metoclopramide.