T. Tullberg et al., COMPARISON OF CONTRAST-ENHANCED COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY AND GADOLINIUM-ENHANCED MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING ONE-YEAR AFTER LUMBAR DISKECTOMY, Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 19(2), 1994, pp. 183-188
Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with int
ravenous contrast were performed on a prospective group of 35 consecut
ive patients 1 year after surgery for disc herniation. The aim of the
study was to compare the two methods in the analysis of postoperative
changes. Computed tomography showed, compared with MRI, more extensive
scar tissue in 12 patients and increased deformation of the dural sac
in 5 patients. However, the nerve root was better delineated by MRI,
and this facilitated the assessment of root thickening in 13 patients
and root displacement, which could not be seen by CT in seven patients
. MRI revealed four small protrusions that were not visible with CT. T
he two methods were found to be of equal value in regard to findings s
uch as disc herniations and foraminal stenosis, which might influence
the surgeons decision to perform repeat surgery.