E. Trinkaus et al., POSTCRANIAL ROBUSTICITY IN HOMO .2. HUMERAL BILATERAL ASYMMETRY AND BONE PLASTICITY, American journal of physical anthropology, 93(1), 1994, pp. 1-34
The analysis of humeral asymmetry in Recent human skeletal samples and
an extant tennis-player sample documents minimal asymmetry in bone le
ngth, little asymmetry in distal humeral articular breadth, but pronou
nced and variable asymmetry in mid- and distal diaphyseal cross-sectio
nal geometric parameters. More specifically, skeletal samples of norma
l modern Euroamericans, prehistoric and early historic Amerindians, an
d prehistoric Japanese show moderate (ca. 5-14%) median asymmetry in d
iaphyseal cross-sectional areas and polar second moments of area, wher
eas the tennis-player sample, with pronounced unilateral physical acti
vity, exhibits median asymmetries of 28-57% in the same parameters. A
sample of Neandertals with nonpathological upper limbs exhibits simila
rly low articular asymmetry but pronounced diaphyseal asymmetries, ave
raging 24-57%. In addition, three Neandertals with actual or possible
post-traumatic upper limb alterations have the same low articular asym
metry but extremely high diaphyseal asymmetries, averaging 112-215%. T
hese data support those from experimental work on animals, exercise pr
ograms of humans, and human clinical contexts in establishing the high
degree of diaphyseal plasticity possible for humans, past and present
, under changing biomechanical loading conditions. This lends support
to activity-related functional interpretations of changing human diaph
yseal morphology and robusticity-during the Pleistocene. (C) 1994 Wile
y-Liss, Inc.